"Targeting groups that have applied for tax-exempt status for additional scrutiny because they appear to have an electoral motive is proper – as long as the same criteria is applied to all regardless of political viewpoints. At a time of unprecedented use of nonprofit organizations to funnel money for use in political campaigns, we need more enforcement to prevent evasion of campaign, disclosure and tax laws, not less."

The IRS Should Do More, Not Less, Scrutinizing of Political Groups (via azspot)

(via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)

50 notes

descentintotyranny:

Socialist Worker: The thanks they get for voting Obama
Barack Obama is giving a whole new meaning to the phrase “adding insult to injury.”
May 15 2013
NATIONAL TEACHERS Appreciation Week, traditionally the first full week of May, passed this year without even a token statement from Barack Obama. Instead, the White House issued a presidential proclamation honoring the same weeklong period as…National Charter Schools Week.
Yep, you read that right. Barack Obama—who got the votes of millions of teachers last November and whose party depends on hundreds of millions of dollars in political spending by teachers’ unions and the rest of organized labor—not only couldn’t be bothered to utter a symbolic good word about teachers. He went out of his way to celebrate an initiative of the Republican Bush administration that spotlights a centerpiece of the anti-teacher school deform agenda.
If you’re a regular reader of SocialistWorker.org, you’ll know that there’s a long history of the Democrats talking populist when they’re asking for the votes of their working-class and liberal base of support—but acting quite differently when “the party of the people” is in office.
But Obama and Co. seem almost eager to rub their supporters’ faces in it.
Teachers aren’t the only example. At election time, one of the most reliable appeals for voting Democratic is to raise the specter of Republicans taking away a woman’s right to choose. The urgent pleas of pro-choice supporters in 2008 and 2012 to vote for Obama were a stark contrast to his administration’s neglect of the issue.
This week, though, the Obama administration took action on reproductive rights, appealing in court for…continued restrictions. In April, a federal judge struck down an Obama-era rule barring women younger than 17 from obtaining the Plan B “morning-after” pill without a prescription. This Monday, the Justice Department of a pro-choice Democratic president asked a higher court to overturn that decision.
Its reasoning for stopping the judge’s order from going into effect—that women would become “confused” if they gained unrestricted access to Plan B, only to have it taken away later if the Obama administration succeeded in its appeal—was a glaring and infuriating display of contempt for women and their rights.
There are plenty more examples. The willingness of Obama and the Democrats to give ground to Republicans on issue after issue while kicking their own base in the teeth has come into particularly sharp focus this spring. It’s worth pointing out that these are also the opening months of Obama’s second term, during which the president was, according to some liberal commentators writing before the election last year, supposed to prove he was a true progressive after all.
This isn’t a new insight into the nature of the Democratic Party, by any means. But the importance of the lesson that flows from it—anyone who wants to see change must rely not on allies in high places, but the collective strength of our struggles and our movements—is all the more crucial to remember as activists mobilize around the urgent issues we face today, from immigrant rights to climate justice and more.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
THE REPUBLICAN Party and the Democratic Party aren’t identical. If they were, there wouldn’t be any reason to have two of them.
Most of the time, most Democrats stand to the left of most Republicans. That’s a big part of why Democrats are effective in carrying out an agenda that serves the political and social status quo. They can win the votes and political support of masses of ordinary people well to their left who fear even worse from the other guys.
But some of the time, there’s not even the proverbial dime’s worth of difference between Democrats and Republicans. Charter schools and the corporate school deform agenda are a prime example.
The standardized testing mania, scapegoating of teachers and encroachment of private interests into public education began in earnest under George W. Bush with his No Child Left Behind law. But Obama took over the Bush program for public schools and kicked it into high gear. His administration’s Race to the Top program dangled billions of dollars in front of state governments, in return for passing “reform” laws that tied teacher evaluation to test scores and opened the way for more charter schools, among other measures.
Obama and his Education Secretary Arne Duncan were speaking glowingly about charters long before National Charter Schools Week. The language of Obama’s proclamation is typical: “These learning laboratories give educators the chance to try new models and methods that can encourage excellence in the classroom and prepare more of our children for college and careers.”
Every part of that statement flies in the face of the facts. Charter schools prepare fewer of our children for anything at all, because the private operators who run schools with public funds get to exclude the students they don’t want.
For example, a 2011 study of 14 Florida school districts found that more than 86 percent of charter schools didn’t have a single student with a severe disability, compared to more than half of district public schools that did. The pattern is similar with homeless students. As education expert Diane Ravitch reported at a 2010 hearing, “New York City has 50,000 homeless students, but only about 100 are enrolled in a charter school. If a proportionate number were in charters, there would be 1,500, not 100.
In other words, charter schools on the whole take the students they want from public schools—preferably, those without special needs that cost more money—and leave the rest behind in a system that’s even more starved for financial resources, thanks to the subsidies for charters.
And even so, charter schools can’t demonstrate that they do any better at educating the students they do take. On the contrary, a 2009 study by the RAND Corporation, for example, analyzed charter schools in five major cities and three states, and found that in every location, students in the charter schools performed no better at best, and demonstrably poorer at worst.
So why the zealous cheerleading for charter schools? The answer: Follow the money.
Follow the money in a direct sense—more than one-third of charter schools were run by for-profit companies as of 2010, according to the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. Public school privatization is proving to be an even bigger bonanza in other areas—companies like Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. are scrambling to get their hands on the billions to be made off the standardized testing bonanza.
But you can also follow the money in an indirect sense. The charter school crusade is aimed squarely at the power of the teachers’ unions—according to Diane Ravitch, 90 percent of charters are non-union. Charterization has become a dependable way to get rid of well-paid, veteran, union teachers—and replace them with educators who labor under the conditions described by one Ohio teacher in a comment at Ravitch’s website:

I’ve been an educator in Columbus, Ohio, since university. In my eighth year, I currently earn $34,000 before taxes at a 9-12 charter school. I can be fired at any time. I have no tenure, no union and scarce resources to teach…My family needs the money I earn, so I must teach, but I just pray a public school gives me a chance.

Teachers and education workers are one of the last remaining strongholds of the union movement—around three in every 10 union cards in the U.S. are held by members of the American Federation of Teachers or National Education Association. An injury to those unions through charterization is an injury inflicted on the whole working class, to the benefit of the bosses.
Plus, there’s the ideological angle. Charter schools are promoted by free marketeers, liberal and conservative alike, who claim that the private sector always does a better job than wasteful, corrupt, bloated big government.
Actually, it’s abundantly clear that the private sector is a cesspool of waste, corruption, bloat and worse—which is why the charters need a vigorous, pay-no-attention-to-that-man-behind-the-curtain public relations campaign, with the president of the United States serving as cheerleader-in-chief.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
REPUBLICANS AND their media mouthpieces like Fox News still like to portray the Democrats as tools of organized labor, but it’s hard to believe anyone buys that any more.
Labor’s political power has been shrinking with its membership numbers for decades, while business’ spending advantage in elections expands with each cycle. But more to the point, the leadership of the Democratic Party has molded itself so completely into the role of servants to Corporate America that it doesn’t even bother with the old symbolic gestures any more.
As historian Van Gosse wrote after last year’s election, “The mass party of the center, birthed 20 years ago by Bill Clinton triangulating his way into a ‘socially liberal’ version of neoliberalism (or what used to be ‘liberal Republicanism’ in the days of Nelson Rockefeller and George Romney), has been brought to fruition by Barack Obama’s savvy Chicago apparatchiks.”
So it shouldn’t be any surprise that the Obama administration’s policies are bent and twisted in whatever ways are necessary to serve the interests of Corporate America, at the expense of the people who make up the main base of support for the Democrats.
But even as Obama and the Democrats thank their most devoted supporters with betrayals and insults, they won’t tolerate the least criticism from their base.
On this score, the Obama White House is every bit as belligerent as Democratic administrations that came before it—maybe more so. Thus, Joe Biden told anyone dissatisfied with the multitrillion-dollar bailout of Wall Street to “stop whining”; Obama himself mocked liberal critics of his health care law for “seeing the glass as half empty”; and White House spokesperson Robert Gibbs sounded off against the “professional left” that would only “be satisfied when we have Canadian health care, and we’ve eliminated the Pentagon.”
In stark contrast to their timid attitude in confrontations with Republicans, the Democrats save their real venom for anyone to their left who dares to hold them accountable for the policies and principles they claim, usually at election time, to stand for.
You don’t have to go far on the Internet to find a liberal commentator who fumes about this two-faced behavior. But all too often, even critical voices accept that the only “realistic” course in a two-party system is to seek to influence their Democratic “allies.”
But is it realistic to expect working people to get a hearing from a party that is so intent on listening only to the demands and dictates of Corporate America?
Or is it more realistic to rely—as the most important struggles for change in history always have—on the power of mass mobilization and action at the grassroots to build a political alternative that breaks out of the confines of the two-party political system?

descentintotyranny:

Socialist Worker: The thanks they get for voting Obama

Barack Obama is giving a whole new meaning to the phrase “adding insult to injury.”

May 15 2013

NATIONAL TEACHERS Appreciation Week, traditionally the first full week of May, passed this year without even a token statement from Barack Obama. Instead, the White House issued a presidential proclamation honoring the same weeklong period as…National Charter Schools Week.

Yep, you read that right. Barack Obama—who got the votes of millions of teachers last November and whose party depends on hundreds of millions of dollars in political spending by teachers’ unions and the rest of organized labor—not only couldn’t be bothered to utter a symbolic good word about teachers. He went out of his way to celebrate an initiative of the Republican Bush administration that spotlights a centerpiece of the anti-teacher school deform agenda.

If you’re a regular reader of SocialistWorker.org, you’ll know that there’s a long history of the Democrats talking populist when they’re asking for the votes of their working-class and liberal base of support—but acting quite differently when “the party of the people” is in office.

But Obama and Co. seem almost eager to rub their supporters’ faces in it.

Teachers aren’t the only example. At election time, one of the most reliable appeals for voting Democratic is to raise the specter of Republicans taking away a woman’s right to choose. The urgent pleas of pro-choice supporters in 2008 and 2012 to vote for Obama were a stark contrast to his administration’s neglect of the issue.

This week, though, the Obama administration took action on reproductive rights, appealing in court for…continued restrictions. In April, a federal judge struck down an Obama-era rule barring women younger than 17 from obtaining the Plan B “morning-after” pill without a prescription. This Monday, the Justice Department of a pro-choice Democratic president asked a higher court to overturn that decision.

Its reasoning for stopping the judge’s order from going into effect—that women would become “confused” if they gained unrestricted access to Plan B, only to have it taken away later if the Obama administration succeeded in its appeal—was a glaring and infuriating display of contempt for women and their rights.

There are plenty more examples. The willingness of Obama and the Democrats to give ground to Republicans on issue after issue while kicking their own base in the teeth has come into particularly sharp focus this spring. It’s worth pointing out that these are also the opening months of Obama’s second term, during which the president was, according to some liberal commentators writing before the election last year, supposed to prove he was a true progressive after all.

This isn’t a new insight into the nature of the Democratic Party, by any means. But the importance of the lesson that flows from it—anyone who wants to see change must rely not on allies in high places, but the collective strength of our struggles and our movements—is all the more crucial to remember as activists mobilize around the urgent issues we face today, from immigrant rights to climate justice and more.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

THE REPUBLICAN Party and the Democratic Party aren’t identical. If they were, there wouldn’t be any reason to have two of them.

Most of the time, most Democrats stand to the left of most Republicans. That’s a big part of why Democrats are effective in carrying out an agenda that serves the political and social status quo. They can win the votes and political support of masses of ordinary people well to their left who fear even worse from the other guys.

But some of the time, there’s not even the proverbial dime’s worth of difference between Democrats and Republicans. Charter schools and the corporate school deform agenda are a prime example.

The standardized testing mania, scapegoating of teachers and encroachment of private interests into public education began in earnest under George W. Bush with his No Child Left Behind law. But Obama took over the Bush program for public schools and kicked it into high gear. His administration’s Race to the Top program dangled billions of dollars in front of state governments, in return for passing “reform” laws that tied teacher evaluation to test scores and opened the way for more charter schools, among other measures.

Obama and his Education Secretary Arne Duncan were speaking glowingly about charters long before National Charter Schools Week. The language of Obama’s proclamation is typical: “These learning laboratories give educators the chance to try new models and methods that can encourage excellence in the classroom and prepare more of our children for college and careers.”

Every part of that statement flies in the face of the facts. Charter schools prepare fewer of our children for anything at all, because the private operators who run schools with public funds get to exclude the students they don’t want.

For example, a 2011 study of 14 Florida school districts found that more than 86 percent of charter schools didn’t have a single student with a severe disability, compared to more than half of district public schools that did. The pattern is similar with homeless students. As education expert Diane Ravitch reported at a 2010 hearing, “New York City has 50,000 homeless students, but only about 100 are enrolled in a charter school. If a proportionate number were in charters, there would be 1,500, not 100.

In other words, charter schools on the whole take the students they want from public schools—preferably, those without special needs that cost more money—and leave the rest behind in a system that’s even more starved for financial resources, thanks to the subsidies for charters.

And even so, charter schools can’t demonstrate that they do any better at educating the students they do take. On the contrary, a 2009 study by the RAND Corporation, for example, analyzed charter schools in five major cities and three states, and found that in every location, students in the charter schools performed no better at best, and demonstrably poorer at worst.

So why the zealous cheerleading for charter schools? The answer: Follow the money.

Follow the money in a direct sense—more than one-third of charter schools were run by for-profit companies as of 2010, according to the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. Public school privatization is proving to be an even bigger bonanza in other areas—companies like Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. are scrambling to get their hands on the billions to be made off the standardized testing bonanza.

But you can also follow the money in an indirect sense. The charter school crusade is aimed squarely at the power of the teachers’ unions—according to Diane Ravitch, 90 percent of charters are non-union. Charterization has become a dependable way to get rid of well-paid, veteran, union teachers—and replace them with educators who labor under the conditions described by one Ohio teacher in a comment at Ravitch’s website:

I’ve been an educator in Columbus, Ohio, since university. In my eighth year, I currently earn $34,000 before taxes at a 9-12 charter school. I can be fired at any time. I have no tenure, no union and scarce resources to teach…My family needs the money I earn, so I must teach, but I just pray a public school gives me a chance.

Teachers and education workers are one of the last remaining strongholds of the union movement—around three in every 10 union cards in the U.S. are held by members of the American Federation of Teachers or National Education Association. An injury to those unions through charterization is an injury inflicted on the whole working class, to the benefit of the bosses.

Plus, there’s the ideological angle. Charter schools are promoted by free marketeers, liberal and conservative alike, who claim that the private sector always does a better job than wasteful, corrupt, bloated big government.

Actually, it’s abundantly clear that the private sector is a cesspool of waste, corruption, bloat and worse—which is why the charters need a vigorous, pay-no-attention-to-that-man-behind-the-curtain public relations campaign, with the president of the United States serving as cheerleader-in-chief.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

REPUBLICANS AND their media mouthpieces like Fox News still like to portray the Democrats as tools of organized labor, but it’s hard to believe anyone buys that any more.

Labor’s political power has been shrinking with its membership numbers for decades, while business’ spending advantage in elections expands with each cycle. But more to the point, the leadership of the Democratic Party has molded itself so completely into the role of servants to Corporate America that it doesn’t even bother with the old symbolic gestures any more.

As historian Van Gosse wrote after last year’s election, “The mass party of the center, birthed 20 years ago by Bill Clinton triangulating his way into a ‘socially liberal’ version of neoliberalism (or what used to be ‘liberal Republicanism’ in the days of Nelson Rockefeller and George Romney), has been brought to fruition by Barack Obama’s savvy Chicago apparatchiks.”

So it shouldn’t be any surprise that the Obama administration’s policies are bent and twisted in whatever ways are necessary to serve the interests of Corporate America, at the expense of the people who make up the main base of support for the Democrats.

But even as Obama and the Democrats thank their most devoted supporters with betrayals and insults, they won’t tolerate the least criticism from their base.

On this score, the Obama White House is every bit as belligerent as Democratic administrations that came before it—maybe more so. Thus, Joe Biden told anyone dissatisfied with the multitrillion-dollar bailout of Wall Street to “stop whining”; Obama himself mocked liberal critics of his health care law for “seeing the glass as half empty”; and White House spokesperson Robert Gibbs sounded off against the “professional left” that would only “be satisfied when we have Canadian health care, and we’ve eliminated the Pentagon.”

In stark contrast to their timid attitude in confrontations with Republicans, the Democrats save their real venom for anyone to their left who dares to hold them accountable for the policies and principles they claim, usually at election time, to stand for.

You don’t have to go far on the Internet to find a liberal commentator who fumes about this two-faced behavior. But all too often, even critical voices accept that the only “realistic” course in a two-party system is to seek to influence their Democratic “allies.”

But is it realistic to expect working people to get a hearing from a party that is so intent on listening only to the demands and dictates of Corporate America?

Or is it more realistic to rely—as the most important struggles for change in history always have—on the power of mass mobilization and action at the grassroots to build a political alternative that breaks out of the confines of the two-party political system?

3 notes

satanic-capitalist:

Finance: “Après Moi, Le Déluge - Make Money Now To Hell With Tomorrow (by TheRealNews)

Published on May 15, 2013

Dr. Heiner Flassbeck: We’re in worst shape now than in 2008 because at least then there was hope governments would face up to the situation

3 notes

They do protect and serve, just not you

socialismartnature:

Does anyone believe the NYPD hasn’t long realized that there’s no connection between the stop-and-frisk racial profiling program and preventing crime and violence?

image

 … Surely cops don’t sit around the station house talking about how their true purpose is to suppress the rebellious underclass. But apparently, they do. Here’s how one Brooklyn police supervisor puts it on one of the secretly recorded tapes played at the Floyd trial:

If you get too big of a crowd there, you know, they’re going to get out of control, and they’re going to think that they own the block. We own the block. They don’t own the block, alright? They might live there, but we own the block, alright? We own the streets here.

(via satanic-capitalist)

28 notes

sustainableprosperity:
Opting Out of Wall Street and Building Sustainable, Resilient Communities: Remaking Finance, Part III
Wednesday, 08 May 2013 00:00By Margaret Flowers and Kevin Zeese, Truthout | News Analysis
 

This article is the continuation of a series on remaking our financial system so that itserves and protects people instead of the “too big to fail or jail” banks, collectively called big finance. More and more people see that the current financial system rewards those who hoard their money and invest in risky or damaging ventures such as derivatives and other forms of speculation and are asking: how do we opt out of Wall Street now?
They do not want to be part of big finance practices that keep money out of the economy and place us all in danger of losing our bank deposits if an investment goes badly. Almost all Americans experience the predatory practices that have put the population in debt in order to meet basic needs for housing, education and health care.
This article points to steps you can take in your community now to escape this corrupt system. Previous articles looked at longer-term changes that require government action, such as public banks. In this article, we focus on communities taking action to create alternative currencies and ways they can be integrated into a financial system that connects people with each other, builds dignity and community, and reduces dependence on big finance.
On Clearing the FOG, we spoke with three people who are actively engaged in building alternative economies. Edgar Cahn, author of No More Throw-Away People: The Co-Production Imperative, is founder of the concept of time dollars.Paul Glover created the first local currency based on hours, or labor, in Ithaca, New York. Glover has written many books, including Hometown Money: How to Enrich Your Community with Local Currency. And Jeff Dicken directs Baltimore Green Currency, a local currency backed by federal dollars that has a larger social mission.
All three guests have a vision of a new type of economy that is based on the ideas that all people have talents that contribute to the greater society and that we are mutually interdependent. They see local currencies as a way to build local supply chains and new businesses and services that create sustainable and resilient communities by keeping money circulating in their communities. Local living economies will provide necessary protection when the next economic crash occurs.
Time Dollars Bridge the Two Economies
To fully understand the importance of time dollars, we must first recognize that there are two simultaneous economies: the market economy, in which money is exchanged to purchase goods and services and the non-market economy, which includes all of the activities within families, neighborhoods and communities, in which money is not exchanged. Both economies have a purpose and are necessary for a thriving and healthy society.
Normally, we only study and hear about the market economy. But the needs of a society cannot be met purely within a market economy. The market is based on scarcity: the less there is of something, the more valuable it is. And the market doesn’t value family, community and democracy, the things that are needed to create a society in which most of us would want to live. The non-market economy is not included in current economic measures like the Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
At the heart of the concept of time dollars is a restructuring of the operating system on which the economy is based into one that values the non-market economy equally with the market economy. Cahn states that the old operating system (the market economy) “used to work fairly well, but it was subsidized by labor exacted from the subordination of women, the exploitation of minorities, racism, and the exploitation of immigrants.” That system has been “bled dry,” so it is time to replace it with a system that restores and reinvigorates family, neighborhood and community.
Cahn developed the idea for time dollars when he was hospitalized. He was being cared for, but he was not in a position to give anything back and he did not like feeling useless. It was in the 1980s, during a recession with high unemployment and many unmet needs, and the thought occurred to him that others might not like feeling useless either. Most people don’t like receiving services without being able to give something in return.
The time dollar system restores dignity and connects people to each other. People identify for themselves what they have to give and what they need. And every person has something to give. It can be running errands, fixing things, providing companionship or services or teaching someone. People earn time dollars for the work they do, and they can use those to purchase the services they need. Time dollars place value on the unpaid work that is done in families and communities. They redefine what we value as work and recognize the value of every person.
A fundamental component of time banks is the idea of co-production, which includes social justice as an integral element. The market economy creates externalities for which it is often not held responsible. The obvious externalities are those due to environmental harm. The market economy also creates social externalities or harm to the non-market economy, to one’s ability to do the work that is necessary for family and community. Time dollars are a bridge between the two economies. And co-production means that individuals and communities must be enlisted as co-producers of the outcome and must have access to social infrastructure as well as physical infrastructure. Cahn summarizes, “If you care about justice, democracy and sustainability, you must enlist the community.”
Co-production is based on five core principles. First is that people of all ages have something to give that is real and that those gifts should be recorded and valued. Second, what is commonly called volunteering should be honored as work. Third is reciprocity, that we give help and receive help. Reciprocity creates the awareness that we need each other and develops a “pay it forward” mentality. Fourth is social capital, which means we must invest in ways to bring people together and embed them in a support group in order to have lasting results. And fifth is respect, that everyone’s voice is equal and that there must be ways to know when something is not working.
The time dollar system has evolved into an international movement of time banks in 37 countries. There are 300 time banks in the United States and they have handled millions of time dollars. One program in New York has logged 196,000 hours. Research shows that only 10 percent of participants regularly report their hours and only 25 percent report with some frequency, so the total amount of hours is much higher. The software that helps a community keep track of the time dollars and services, called Community Weaver, is open source and available for free on the Time Bank web site.
When Cahn first discussed the idea of time banks, he was discouraged from going forward for many reasons. There were concerns about the legality and taxation and the effect it would have on society. It is now clear that these concerns were unfounded and that time dollars are a success. They do make a difference in communities. People express trust and hope, and they learn good things about each other, even in places that have a reputation for being dangerous neighborhoods.
Community Currencies Connect
Another type of local monetary system is community or local currency. Local dollars are designed, created and printed and then are used in the community at places of business that agree to accept them. There is a long history of barter-exchanges, on which community currencies build. Paul Glover started the first local currency in the United States, called the Ithaca Hour, in 1991.
Ithaca hours are worth one hour of work or ten federal dollars. They come in denominations down to one-eighth hour. At the time they were introduced, they immediately doubled the minimum wage, although some professionals charge more than one Ithaca Hour for an hour of work. They are accepted by 500 businesses within a 20 mile range around Ithaca, New York.
Ithaca Hours are a form of time currency that is backed by both time, or labor, and federal dollars. Some local currencies are backed by only federal dollars, such as theBNote in Baltimore. BNotes are exchanged for federal dollars at a rate of 11 BNotes for ten federal dollars and are then used at hundreds of local businesses which accept them. Thus, an immediate benefit to BNote users is a 10 percent discount on purchases.
Perhaps the most important benefit of local currencies is that they keep money circulating within a community, which has a multiplier effect. Instead of dollars being spent at a store and then being immediately siphoned off to whatever outside corporation owns that store, BNotes stay in the community. Local businesses are more likely to buy the goods and services they need from other local suppliers or businesses.
A study done by Local First of Grand Rapids, Michigan, showed that a 10 percent shift in spending away from chain stores to local businesses “would generate an annual economic impact of nearly $200 million and create 1,300 jobs with over $70 million in payroll.” Local currencies are a tool to teach people in the community to use more local independent businesses, which strengthens the community. But they are more than a tool, because local currencies teach that money is really a temporary way to store value between transactions and that a community can decide collectively how they want to handle that storage.
Glover explains that “Ithaca hours connect, while dollars control.” Federal dollars are based on debt and an extractive economy. When federal dollars are used, fees and interest go to big finance. Local dollars connect people to local businesses and connect local businesses to each other, thereby building community and the local economy.
The success of local currencies depends on how much they are used in the community and the number and diversity of businesses that accept them. As Glover describes in A Recipe for Successful Community Currency, there must be networkers in the community who recruit businesses, connect them to local suppliers and services, and teach people how to use the dollars and troubleshoot when problems arise. Local currencies are like other cooperative institutions in that they take constant attention to function well.
Building Sustainable and Resilient Communities
Local currencies provide a vehicle to conduct our lives outside of big finance and to strengthen our communities. But the amount of actual economic impact is constrained by the amount of goods and services that can be sourced and produced locally. This is called the Law of Local Currencies: “The degree of economic activity accounted for by a local currency cannot exceed the degree of sufficiency of the community in which it is used.”
In order to really opt out of Wall Street, local currencies must stimulate greater local supply chains and be tied into a bigger system of finance. So part of the work of local currencies is to assess what goods and services are purchased or needed in the community and make funds and space available to create those goods and services through independent businesses or worker-owned cooperatives. The goal is to meet more of the communities needs at the local level - that is, to build local, sustainable communities.
The ideal local economy would also have closed feedback loops, meaning that the resources needed to create something were produced locally and the waste from the production and use of that something was recycled in a useful way. This is how a community creates sustainability and resilience in the case of an economic crisis.
Local currencies can be used to provide funds to create new businesses and support existing businesses through no-interest micro-credit loans. Glover was able to do that with Ithaca Dollars. Loans without interest were made in amounts of up to $30,000. And Dicken envisions using the federal dollars that are collected through their exchange for BNotes to back a rotating system of credit. In these situations, rather than creating monetary interest, the real interest earned from small loans is the communal interest generated by making the community a better place.
Ultimately, there may be ways to connect communities in a region through local currencies to build more diverse and resilient supply chains. And Glover envisions ways to build a currency backed by labor that can be used nationwide to replace currency based on extraction. InLocal Dollars, Local Sense, author Michael Shuman also describes creating regional investment institutions or local stock markets that provide a way to build community and individual wealth outside of Wall Street.
Solidarity Economy
As more people realize that the current debt-based extraction economy serves the interests of big finance at a cost to people and the planet, support for alternative economies is growing. Around the world, the new economy is called a solidarity economy because it is based on cooperation rather than competition. The new economy replenishes and creates abundance rather than destroying and encouraging scarcity.
Money is a concept, a way to store value. It is up to us to decide what we value and how we choose to store it. We can create systems that reduce our dependence on American empire and stop fueling exploitation and wars for resources. We can create systems that value each person and are based on values that rebuild communities, justice, trust and democracy. We can create systems that involve participation by everyone and guarantee that basic needs are met in a way that restores dignity. The need for these systems is great. The opportunity to make them a reality is here.
You can listen to Alternative Currencies and Economies with Jeff Dicken, Paul Glover, and Edgar Cahn on Clearing the FOG Radio.

This article was first published on Truthout and any reprint or reproduction on any other website must acknowledge Truthout as the original site of publication.




MARGARET FLOWERS AND KEVIN ZEESE

Kevin Zeese JD and Margaret Flowers MD co-host ClearingtheFOGRadio.org on We Act Radio 1480 AM Washington, DC and on Economic Democracy Media, co-direct It’s Our Economy and are organizers of the Occupation of Washington, DC. Their twitters are @KBZeese and @MFlowers8.

sustainableprosperity:

Opting Out of Wall Street and Building Sustainable, Resilient Communities: Remaking Finance, Part III

Wednesday, 08 May 2013 00:00By Margaret Flowers and Kevin ZeeseTruthout | News Analysis

 

This article is the continuation of a series on remaking our financial system so that itserves and protects people instead of the “too big to fail or jail” banks, collectively called big finance. More and more people see that the current financial system rewards those who hoard their money and invest in risky or damaging ventures such as derivatives and other forms of speculation and are asking: how do we opt out of Wall Street now?

They do not want to be part of big finance practices that keep money out of the economy and place us all in danger of losing our bank deposits if an investment goes badly. Almost all Americans experience the predatory practices that have put the population in debt in order to meet basic needs for housing, education and health care.

This article points to steps you can take in your community now to escape this corrupt system. Previous articles looked at longer-term changes that require government action, such as public banks. In this article, we focus on communities taking action to create alternative currencies and ways they can be integrated into a financial system that connects people with each other, builds dignity and community, and reduces dependence on big finance.

On Clearing the FOG, we spoke with three people who are actively engaged in building alternative economies. Edgar Cahn, author of No More Throw-Away People: The Co-Production Imperative, is founder of the concept of time dollars.Paul Glover created the first local currency based on hours, or labor, in Ithaca, New York. Glover has written many books, including Hometown Money: How to Enrich Your Community with Local Currency. And Jeff Dicken directs Baltimore Green Currency, a local currency backed by federal dollars that has a larger social mission.

All three guests have a vision of a new type of economy that is based on the ideas that all people have talents that contribute to the greater society and that we are mutually interdependent. They see local currencies as a way to build local supply chains and new businesses and services that create sustainable and resilient communities by keeping money circulating in their communities. Local living economies will provide necessary protection when the next economic crash occurs.

Time Dollars Bridge the Two Economies

To fully understand the importance of time dollars, we must first recognize that there are two simultaneous economies: the market economy, in which money is exchanged to purchase goods and services and the non-market economy, which includes all of the activities within families, neighborhoods and communities, in which money is not exchanged. Both economies have a purpose and are necessary for a thriving and healthy society.

Normally, we only study and hear about the market economy. But the needs of a society cannot be met purely within a market economy. The market is based on scarcity: the less there is of something, the more valuable it is. And the market doesn’t value family, community and democracy, the things that are needed to create a society in which most of us would want to live. The non-market economy is not included in current economic measures like the Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

At the heart of the concept of time dollars is a restructuring of the operating system on which the economy is based into one that values the non-market economy equally with the market economy. Cahn states that the old operating system (the market economy) “used to work fairly well, but it was subsidized by labor exacted from the subordination of women, the exploitation of minorities, racism, and the exploitation of immigrants.” That system has been “bled dry,” so it is time to replace it with a system that restores and reinvigorates family, neighborhood and community.

Cahn developed the idea for time dollars when he was hospitalized. He was being cared for, but he was not in a position to give anything back and he did not like feeling useless. It was in the 1980s, during a recession with high unemployment and many unmet needs, and the thought occurred to him that others might not like feeling useless either. Most people don’t like receiving services without being able to give something in return.

The time dollar system restores dignity and connects people to each other. People identify for themselves what they have to give and what they need. And every person has something to give. It can be running errands, fixing things, providing companionship or services or teaching someone. People earn time dollars for the work they do, and they can use those to purchase the services they need. Time dollars place value on the unpaid work that is done in families and communities. They redefine what we value as work and recognize the value of every person.

A fundamental component of time banks is the idea of co-production, which includes social justice as an integral element. The market economy creates externalities for which it is often not held responsible. The obvious externalities are those due to environmental harm. The market economy also creates social externalities or harm to the non-market economy, to one’s ability to do the work that is necessary for family and community. Time dollars are a bridge between the two economies. And co-production means that individuals and communities must be enlisted as co-producers of the outcome and must have access to social infrastructure as well as physical infrastructure. Cahn summarizes, “If you care about justice, democracy and sustainability, you must enlist the community.”

Co-production is based on five core principles. First is that people of all ages have something to give that is real and that those gifts should be recorded and valued. Second, what is commonly called volunteering should be honored as work. Third is reciprocity, that we give help and receive help. Reciprocity creates the awareness that we need each other and develops a “pay it forward” mentality. Fourth is social capital, which means we must invest in ways to bring people together and embed them in a support group in order to have lasting results. And fifth is respect, that everyone’s voice is equal and that there must be ways to know when something is not working.

The time dollar system has evolved into an international movement of time banks in 37 countries. There are 300 time banks in the United States and they have handled millions of time dollars. One program in New York has logged 196,000 hours. Research shows that only 10 percent of participants regularly report their hours and only 25 percent report with some frequency, so the total amount of hours is much higher. The software that helps a community keep track of the time dollars and services, called Community Weaver, is open source and available for free on the Time Bank web site.

When Cahn first discussed the idea of time banks, he was discouraged from going forward for many reasons. There were concerns about the legality and taxation and the effect it would have on society. It is now clear that these concerns were unfounded and that time dollars are a success. They do make a difference in communities. People express trust and hope, and they learn good things about each other, even in places that have a reputation for being dangerous neighborhoods.

Community Currencies Connect

Another type of local monetary system is community or local currency. Local dollars are designed, created and printed and then are used in the community at places of business that agree to accept them. There is a long history of barter-exchanges, on which community currencies build. Paul Glover started the first local currency in the United States, called the Ithaca Hour, in 1991.

Ithaca hours are worth one hour of work or ten federal dollars. They come in denominations down to one-eighth hour. At the time they were introduced, they immediately doubled the minimum wage, although some professionals charge more than one Ithaca Hour for an hour of work. They are accepted by 500 businesses within a 20 mile range around Ithaca, New York.

Ithaca Hours are a form of time currency that is backed by both time, or labor, and federal dollars. Some local currencies are backed by only federal dollars, such as theBNote in Baltimore. BNotes are exchanged for federal dollars at a rate of 11 BNotes for ten federal dollars and are then used at hundreds of local businesses which accept them. Thus, an immediate benefit to BNote users is a 10 percent discount on purchases.

Perhaps the most important benefit of local currencies is that they keep money circulating within a community, which has a multiplier effect. Instead of dollars being spent at a store and then being immediately siphoned off to whatever outside corporation owns that store, BNotes stay in the community. Local businesses are more likely to buy the goods and services they need from other local suppliers or businesses.

study done by Local First of Grand Rapids, Michigan, showed that a 10 percent shift in spending away from chain stores to local businesses “would generate an annual economic impact of nearly $200 million and create 1,300 jobs with over $70 million in payroll.” Local currencies are a tool to teach people in the community to use more local independent businesses, which strengthens the community. But they are more than a tool, because local currencies teach that money is really a temporary way to store value between transactions and that a community can decide collectively how they want to handle that storage.

Glover explains that “Ithaca hours connect, while dollars control.” Federal dollars are based on debt and an extractive economy. When federal dollars are used, fees and interest go to big finance. Local dollars connect people to local businesses and connect local businesses to each other, thereby building community and the local economy.

The success of local currencies depends on how much they are used in the community and the number and diversity of businesses that accept them. As Glover describes in A Recipe for Successful Community Currency, there must be networkers in the community who recruit businesses, connect them to local suppliers and services, and teach people how to use the dollars and troubleshoot when problems arise. Local currencies are like other cooperative institutions in that they take constant attention to function well.

Building Sustainable and Resilient Communities

Local currencies provide a vehicle to conduct our lives outside of big finance and to strengthen our communities. But the amount of actual economic impact is constrained by the amount of goods and services that can be sourced and produced locally. This is called the Law of Local Currencies: “The degree of economic activity accounted for by a local currency cannot exceed the degree of sufficiency of the community in which it is used.”

In order to really opt out of Wall Street, local currencies must stimulate greater local supply chains and be tied into a bigger system of finance. So part of the work of local currencies is to assess what goods and services are purchased or needed in the community and make funds and space available to create those goods and services through independent businesses or worker-owned cooperatives. The goal is to meet more of the communities needs at the local level - that is, to build local, sustainable communities.

The ideal local economy would also have closed feedback loops, meaning that the resources needed to create something were produced locally and the waste from the production and use of that something was recycled in a useful way. This is how a community creates sustainability and resilience in the case of an economic crisis.

Local currencies can be used to provide funds to create new businesses and support existing businesses through no-interest micro-credit loans. Glover was able to do that with Ithaca Dollars. Loans without interest were made in amounts of up to $30,000. And Dicken envisions using the federal dollars that are collected through their exchange for BNotes to back a rotating system of credit. In these situations, rather than creating monetary interest, the real interest earned from small loans is the communal interest generated by making the community a better place.

Ultimately, there may be ways to connect communities in a region through local currencies to build more diverse and resilient supply chains. And Glover envisions ways to build a currency backed by labor that can be used nationwide to replace currency based on extraction. InLocal Dollars, Local Sense, author Michael Shuman also describes creating regional investment institutions or local stock markets that provide a way to build community and individual wealth outside of Wall Street.

Solidarity Economy

As more people realize that the current debt-based extraction economy serves the interests of big finance at a cost to people and the planet, support for alternative economies is growing. Around the world, the new economy is called a solidarity economy because it is based on cooperation rather than competition. The new economy replenishes and creates abundance rather than destroying and encouraging scarcity.

Money is a concept, a way to store value. It is up to us to decide what we value and how we choose to store it. We can create systems that reduce our dependence on American empire and stop fueling exploitation and wars for resources. We can create systems that value each person and are based on values that rebuild communities, justice, trust and democracy. We can create systems that involve participation by everyone and guarantee that basic needs are met in a way that restores dignity. The need for these systems is great. The opportunity to make them a reality is here.

You can listen to Alternative Currencies and Economies with Jeff Dicken, Paul Glover, and Edgar Cahn on Clearing the FOG Radio.

This article was first published on Truthout and any reprint or reproduction on any other website must acknowledge Truthout as the original site of publication.

image

MARGARET FLOWERS AND KEVIN ZEESE

Kevin Zeese JD and Margaret Flowers MD co-host ClearingtheFOGRadio.org on We Act Radio 1480 AM Washington, DC and on Economic Democracy Media, co-direct It’s Our Economy and are organizers of the Occupation of Washington, DC. Their twitters are @KBZeese and @MFlowers8.

2 notes

sociologr:

“I’m talking about restoring to indigenous peoples what obviously they’re entitled to and they have a legitimate claim to in a way that is not devisive but restorative. That’s the idea behind reconciliation” -James Anaya, UN
US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says United Nations | World news | guardian.co.uk

sociologr:

“I’m talking about restoring to indigenous peoples what obviously they’re entitled to and they have a legitimate claim to in a way that is not devisive but restorative. That’s the idea behind reconciliation” -James Anaya, UN

US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says United Nations | World news | guardian.co.uk

(via keeping-sane)

228 notes

satanic-capitalist:

California Domestic Workers Demand Bill of Rights (by TheRealNews)

Published on May 14, 2013

Workers and advocates host Mother’s Day brunch with legislators to urge passage of bill

(via cultureofresistance)

4 notes

America's First Climate Refugees

The residents of Newtok, Alaska could see their village washed away within five years, making them the first American climate refugees. Newtok is surrounded by the Ninglick River, which continues to carry off 100ft or more of land each year. The highest point in the village could be underwater by 2017. The small community of 350 will be scattered across Alaska, with Newtok ceasing to exist. The Guardian reports:

“The snow comes in a different timing now. The snow disappears way late. That is making the geese come at the wrong time. Now they are starting to lay their eggs when there is still snow and ice and we can’t go and pick them,” Tom said. “It’s changing a lot. It’s real, global warming, it’s real.”

(Source: azspot, via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)

27 notes

laboratoryequipment:

How Sharply Should U.S. Cut Salt?A surprising new report questions public health efforts to get Americans to sharply cut back on salt, saying it’s not clear whether eating super-low levels is worth the struggle.Make no mistake: most Americans eat way too much salt, not just from salt shakers but because of sodium hidden inside processed foods and restaurant meals. The report stresses that, overall, the nation needs to ease back on the sodium for better heart health.Read more: http://www.laboratoryequipment.com/news/2013/05/how-sharply-should-us-cut-salt

laboratoryequipment:

How Sharply Should U.S. Cut Salt?

A surprising new report questions public health efforts to get Americans to sharply cut back on salt, saying it’s not clear whether eating super-low levels is worth the struggle.

Make no mistake: most Americans eat way too much salt, not just from salt shakers but because of sodium hidden inside processed foods and restaurant meals. The report stresses that, overall, the nation needs to ease back on the sodium for better heart health.

Read more: http://www.laboratoryequipment.com/news/2013/05/how-sharply-should-us-cut-salt

14 notes

globalvoices:


“This is a joke. Young people nowadays do not belong to the old time, they can’t be f**king brainwashed.”

A prominent Chinese law professor recently revealed in his microblog on popular Twitter-like site Sina Weibo that the Chinese government has imposed a policy on university professors instructing them not to teach seven subjects, including freedom of the press, past mistakes of the communist party, and citizen rights.
Zhang’s Weibo account was deleted soon after and the term “Seven Speak-Nots” (七不講) has been blocked on major social media in China.
Chinese Government Bans Seven ‘Speak-Not’ Subjects

globalvoices:

“This is a joke. Young people nowadays do not belong to the old time, they can’t be f**king brainwashed.”

A prominent Chinese law professor recently revealed in his microblog on popular Twitter-like site Sina Weibo that the Chinese government has imposed a policy on university professors instructing them not to teach seven subjects, including freedom of the press, past mistakes of the communist party, and citizen rights.

Zhang’s Weibo account was deleted soon after and the term “Seven Speak-Nots” (七不講) has been blocked on major social media in China.

Chinese Government Bans Seven ‘Speak-Not’ Subjects

15 notes

Imperialists are behind escalated attacks on Syria

fuckyeahmarxismleninism:

By David Sole

Despite the open and obvious controlling hand of the U.S. and other imperialist powers behind the Syrian opposition, some claiming to be on the “left” continue to call for support of the rebels. The Syrian protest movement may have begun with genuine grievances and goals. But the armed opposition to the Syrian government has clearly become an imperialist intervention to overthrow a government that long has been unwilling to submit to Washington and Israel.

A manifesto issued by a so-called “Global Campaign of Solidarity with the Syrian Revolution” was published on May 1 in the Socialist Worker, organ of the International Socialist Organization in the United States. Its demands echo those of the U.S. government and its NATO allies. They say the departure of President Bashar al-Assad and the victory of the “rebels” would “begin a speedy recovery towards a democratic future.” But where in the world has imperialism brought benefits to the colonized people?

8 notes

"Oh with my pathetic, earthly, Euclidean mind, I know only that there is suffering, that none are to blame, that all things follow simply and directly one from another, that everything flows and finds its level—but that is all Euclidean gibberish, of course I know that, and of course I cannot consent to live by it! What do I care that none are to blame and that I know it—I need retribution, otherwise I will destroy myself. And retribution not somewhere and sometime in infinity, but here and now, on earth, so that I see it myself. I have believed, and I want to see for myself, and if I am dead by that time, let them resurrect me, because it will be too unfair if it all takes place without me. Is it possible that I’ve suffered so that I, together with my evil deeds and sufferings, should be manure for someone’s future harmony? I want to see with my own eyes the hind lie down with the lion, and the murdered man rise up and embrace his murderer. I want to be there when everyone suddenly finds out what it was all for. All religions in the world are based on this desire, and I am a believer. But then there are the children, and what am I going to do with them? That is the question I cannot resolve. For the hundredth time I repeat: there are hosts of questions, but I’ve taken only the children, because here what I need to say is irrefutably clear. Listen: if everyone must suffer, in order to buy eternal harmony with their suffering, pray tell me what have children got to do with it? It’s quite incomprehensible why they should have to suffer, and why they should buy harmony with their suffering. Why do they get thrown on the pile, to manure someone’s future harmony with themselves? I understand solidarity in sin among men; solidarity in retribution I also understand; but what solidarity in sin do little children have? And if it is really true that they, too, are in solidarity with their fathers in all the fathers’ evildoings, that truth certainly is not of this world and is incomprehensible to me. Some joker will say, perhaps, that in any case the child will grow up and have time to sin, but there’s this boy who didn’t grow up but was torn apart by dogs at the age of eight. Oh, Alyosha, I’m not blaspheming! I do understand how the universe will tremble when all in heaven and under the earth merge in one voice of praise, and all that lives and has lived cries out: ‘Just art thou, O Lord, for thy ways are revealed!’ Oh, yes, when the mother and the torturer whose hounds tore her son to pieces embrace each other, and all three cry out with tears: ‘Just art thou, O Lord,’ then of course the crown of knowledge will have come and everything will be explained. But there is the hitch: that is what I cannot accept. And while I am on earth, I hasten to take my own measures. You see, Alyosha, it may well be that if I live until that moment, or rise again in order to see it, I myself will perhaps cry out with all the rest, looking at the mother embracing her child’s tormentor: ‘Just art thou, O Lord!’ but I do not want to cry out with them. While there’s still time, I hasten to defend myself against it, and therefore I absolutely renounce all higher harmony. It is not worth one little tear of even that one tormented child who beat her chest with her little fist and prayed to ‘dear God’ in a stinking outhouse with her unredeemed tears! Not worth it, because her tears remained unredeemed. They must be redeemed, otherwise there can be no harmony. But how, how will you redeem them? Is it possible? Can they be redeemed by being avenged? But what do I care if they are avenged, what do I care if the tormentors are in hell, what can hell set right here, if these ones have already been tormented? And where is the harmony, if there is hell? I want to forgive, and I want to embrace, I don’t want more suffering. And if the suffering of children goes to make up the sum of suffering needed to buy truth, then I assert beforehand that the whole of truth is not worth such a price. I do not, finally, want the mother to embrace the tormentor who let his dogs tear her son to pieces! She dare not forgive him! Let her forgive him for herself, if she wants to, let her forgive the tormentor her immeasurable maternal suffering; but she has no right to forgive the suffering of her child who was torn to pieces, she dare not forgive the tormentor, even if the child himself were to forgive him! And if that is so, if they dare not forgive, then where is the harmony? Is there in the whole world a being who could and would have the right to forgive? I don’t want harmony, for the love of mankind I don’t want it. I want to remain with unrequited suffering. I’d rather remain with my unrequited suffering and my unquenched indignation, even if I am wrong. Besides, they have put too high a price on harmony; we can’t afford to pay so much for admission. And therefore I hasten to return my ticket. And it is my duty, if only as an honest man, to return it as far ahead of time as possible. Which is what I am doing. It’s not that I don’t accept God, Alyosha, I just most respectfully return him the ticket."

Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov, “The Rebllion” (via saccharineslumber)

(via fuckyeahexistentialism)

263 notes

fuckyeahexistentialism:

Andrei Tarkovsky’s “STALKER” (1979)

(Source: sharpmarbles)

2,096 notes

grrrenadine:

The Thin Red Line (1998)

Does our ruin benefit the earth? Does it help the grass to grow, the sun to shine? Is this darkness in you, too? Have you passed through this night?

(via binoches)

182 notes

(Source: purplu, via allaboutclassichollywood)

469 notes